<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, I&#8217;m Going There</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marriagediva.com/2007/12/20/florida-marriage-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marriagediva.com/2007/12/20/florida-marriage-amendment/</link>
	<description>Modern Marriage Musings brought to you by a Modern Married Woman</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: (army)wife</title>
		<link>http://marriagediva.com/2007/12/20/florida-marriage-amendment/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>(army)wife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marriagediva.com/2007/12/20/florida-marriage-amendment/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>"Marriage is not a creation of the law."
Well, if that's the case then I guess the law has no say in what a marriage is or is not.  Therefore, a marriage can in fact be two men or two woman and there is not a single thing the law can do about it.  So if society or at least a part of society wants same-sex marriages, then I don't see why we have a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Marriage is not a creation of the law.&#8221;<br />
Well, if that&#8217;s the case then I guess the law has no say in what a marriage is or is not.  Therefore, a marriage can in fact be two men or two woman and there is not a single thing the law can do about it.  So if society or at least a part of society wants same-sex marriages, then I don&#8217;t see why we have a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
