<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review - Disturbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marriagediva.com/2007/10/16/movie-review-disturbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marriagediva.com/2007/10/16/movie-review-disturbia/</link>
	<description>Modern Marriage Musings brought to you by a Modern Married Woman</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://marriagediva.com/2007/10/16/movie-review-disturbia/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marriagediva.com/2007/10/16/movie-review-disturbia/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Ha!  I wasn't going to go there because I enjoyed the suspense of it all, but I noticed the same thing.  I found her character so over sexualized it was ridiculous.  Did you notice that every move she made seemed like a watered down pole dancing move?  And although it doesn't bother me really, I find it interesting that film makers think that makes a movie better.  Someone needs to let them know they aren't fooling us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  I wasn&#8217;t going to go there because I enjoyed the suspense of it all, but I noticed the same thing.  I found her character so over sexualized it was ridiculous.  Did you notice that every move she made seemed like a watered down pole dancing move?  And although it doesn&#8217;t bother me really, I find it interesting that film makers think that makes a movie better.  Someone needs to let them know they aren&#8217;t fooling us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://marriagediva.com/2007/10/16/movie-review-disturbia/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marriagediva.com/2007/10/16/movie-review-disturbia/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Years ago I never would have noticed this and it would have been something normal. However after studying images of women in the media now I do notice when something is just gratuitous.

 The movie was nice, it had an interesting story line but all I could think of is "why do they keep doing close ups on this girls body parts?" It seemed like the whole movie they were focusing on the neighbors behind, or her chest, or just some part of her body...not her, a body part. It annoyed me. But years ago, I wouldn't have blinked at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago I never would have noticed this and it would have been something normal. However after studying images of women in the media now I do notice when something is just gratuitous.</p>
<p> The movie was nice, it had an interesting story line but all I could think of is &#8220;why do they keep doing close ups on this girls body parts?&#8221; It seemed like the whole movie they were focusing on the neighbors behind, or her chest, or just some part of her body&#8230;not her, a body part. It annoyed me. But years ago, I wouldn&#8217;t have blinked at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
